Psy-Disciplines and the Social Sciences (1)

Authors

  • Dmitry Rogozin Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор
  • Suvi Salmenniemi University of Turku Автор
  • Alisa Kuznetsova HSE University Автор
  • Anastasia Beliaeva Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Автор
  • Leonid Tretyak The Educational Center named after N. P. Bekhtereva Автор
  • Elena Davtian Russian-Armenian University; Network of Medical Centers “Dynasty” Автор
  • Vitaliy Pautov Practicing psychologist Автор
  • Olga Pavlova Moscow State University for Psychology and Education Автор
  • Elena Aleksandrova Moscow State University for Psychology and Education Автор
  • Igor Lyubitov Moscow State University for Psychology and Education Автор
  • Natalia Tarulina Moscow State University for Psychology and Education Автор
  • Anna Lazareva Independent researcher Автор
  • Liliane Laurie Paul-Valéry University Montpellier 3 Автор
  • Tatiana Akuneeva HSE University Автор
  • Ksenia Romanenko HSE University Автор
  • Ekaterina Maslova HSE University Автор
  • Nikita Zorin Psychiatrist, independent researcher Автор
  • Zulfiya Garifullina Practicing psychologist Автор
  • Nikolay Kostelev North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Автор
  • Varvara Bakholdina Lomonosov Moscow State University Автор
  • Eugene Raikhel University of Chicago Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2026-22-69-11-138

Keywords:

medical anthropology, sociology, psychiatry, psychotherapy, psychology, psy-disciplines, history of psychiatry, disciplinary boundaries, anti-psychiatry, medicalisation, psychologisation

Abstract

It is common practice in medicine today to explain mental disorders from the perspective of the so-called biopsychosocial approach, which integrates biological facts, psychological concepts, and an awareness of the social processes that influence the course of diseases. Although this disciplinary eclecticism has repeatedly been criticised by both medicine and psychiatry as well as by the social sciences, the contributions to this discussion raise the question of whether it is actually possible to find common ground and reach an understanding in a dialogue between representatives of different disciplines. In the current and next issue of the journal, psychiatrists, psychotherapists, psychologists, philosophers, historians, sociologists and anthropologists, drawing on their own experience, discuss the possibility of collaboration between the psy-disciplines and the humanities and social sciences. The discussion will address the institutional and practical challenges that specialists face in attempting to overcome interdisciplinary barriers and methodological problems that seem insurmountable to them, and the potential mutual benefits of such collaboration, which, in light of this discussion, no longer seem Utopian. A variety of opinions, illustrating the problems of interdisciplinarity and the inadequacy of this kind of interaction, form a dramatised dialogue divided into two “acts”.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-25

Issue

Section

Forum

Categories

How to Cite

Psy-Disciplines and the Social Sciences (1). (2026). Antropologicheskij Forum Forum for Anthropology and Culture, 69, 11–138. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2026-22-69-11-138